Government Rules Net Against Social Networks! Can the cage win or the wings? Keep your eyes open!

- Unveiled-Jay Vasavada

- If the government's intention is to protect fake news and personal data, then the first law should be to make Aadhar card a phone number for IDs on social networks. So that fake ideas are eliminated from trolling

"We should not be intimidated by the government. The government should scare its people! ”

Like a thumbrule of democracy, this quote is from Alan Moore's world-famous graphic novel 'We for Vendetta'. Also like watching her movie. There is no need to go to classic Hitler's Germany or Idi Amin's Uganda. Myanmar, North Korea, China, Iran, Russia - are in sight. Where governments intimidate the people. A refreshing sample. Esther Hamadi is a 19-year-old girl in Yemen. She posted photos on Instagram without a hijab, and wearing a leather jacket or denim jeans. He has been held captive for two months by a group backed by Iranian mullahs for this "heinous crime." Has taken 'legal' action on it. Started with Drugs and Prostitution. Despite the torture, the girl refused to confess to the 'crime' she was subjected to, and underwent a 'virginity test'. The nations of the world regret it. But what else to do?

This is not a case of murder by fundamentalists. This is special. In murder, the guilt of the murderer is obviously proved. Fundamentalists have an innate animosity with us eroticism. Many wondered why a country with intelligent people was led when Hitler occupied Germany. But his secret was not just racist or nationalist dreams of becoming great. In addition there was the freedom that was stripped away by the change of constitutional laws in installments. If the one who imposes the ban is a fool, then the harsh backlash will come soon. On the other hand, like a weevil, it can be slowly cut into a shell and made into a hollow. What happened in Yemen is this cunning. In which, the fanatical Islamic rulers who are sitting there in the name of Facebook-Instagram post are instilling fear in the minds of the people by attacking a young girl. Instead of 'posting photos', he has been charged with serious sex racket. Gondi is imprisoned, taken away. So as to scare the rest. It is not supported.

It is not that there is a democracy with liberal free freedom of speech where everything is heaven. There is no crime or corruption, no lies or jakubi business. Whether it is America or France, Britain or Japan, there is chaos everywhere. But there is also the power of dissent to oppose dissent. There is an independent media that the government has to be aware of. If Bhopala comes out sooner or later, people will immediately support him in that voice and even if the judiciary is free, even if the top leather blindfold is tied, it is the security of freedom. Those who shaped the future by sacrificing for our freedom 3 years ago had planted shamans to make such a country. The example of Donald Trump is fresh. Despite the riots, violence, racism, gun culture, the constitution system is above image. In spite of all the Gobacharis in India, there was an expression of independence, so we moved away from the remote controlled neighbors.

But censorship imposed by the British to strangle the people against them for fear of freedom, which had been ingrained in their minds for years due to the narrowness of religious sentiments, survived. The tricycle rider is afraid to stumble as he loses the balance support while sitting on the bicycle! Instead of trying to recover, they wallow in their sadness and thus, experience more failure. Hi hi, the enigmatic fear of how everything will go to the abyss is overwhelming. It seems desirable for Ben to come to real daring out of imaginary fear. So, using only 'Freedom of Speech' here, the wild jadsujunvani Jamalgota who advocates or mocks the denunciation of it by giving it a period will be punished. Take a look around on social media.

Yes, there are rumors that Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc. will be shut down in the new IT rules as the government tightens its grip on social media. For people this is a lifeline like oxygen. I took a deep breath. But by setting up a political network on this social network, the current politics is going on, the government has been formed. So there is no question of closing the platform until the election is over. Politicians especially want social networks, but to be their own pet puppy is not like a scarecrow! Ultimately, this network is not run by the public, the business is run by private companies. - Even if Mobhi is visible from the outside, even if it becomes like Kahyagara Kanth due to Samadamdandbheda, he has to take the decision at the behest of the kitchen queen

The people who spin all this have no leisure and no wisdom. The news came at a time when people were struggling against the growing case of Kovid and were head over heels. Late. The censorship reform committee formed by Arun Jaitley (Shyam Benegal, Bhavna Somaiya, Rakesh Mehra) has been in the doldrums for years, but in reverse it could go to a committee like the Producer-Director Appellate Tribunal to appeal against the Film Censor Board. Has been done. Therefore, if the power of the censor board increases or the court's push increases!

Something similar is expected to happen in a different way. Some experts are working on the amendment of 'Social Network / OTT Intermediate' in the IT Act, which came into force on February 8, 2011 without any parliamentary discussion, as the provisions of the 2011 Act have been amended. This fear is not imaginary. The rules of OTT are slightly different, and it's a matter of discussing the matter from such a different angle. Therefore, for the time being, it is reserved for the future, the one who is running Hoha now needs a little scrutiny of the rules on the social network platform. Also sifting through as much confusing legal language as possible.

After the government gave them a three-month deadline, most of the social network companies did not give a damn, but when they had to give a proper roar, everyone except Twitter gave a resounding yes. Also got a period of fifteen days. We have to do that. The government also forms political parties fighting elections, popular social networks are their lifeline. They have to dance to their tune. Horses have to be bridled, not shot.

Many legal experts feel that these amendments alone cannot survive if challenged. It is a different matter that the speed of getting justice in our courts can be easily manipulated. WhatsApp has already challenged it in the Delhi High Court as per the jury. The case of WhatsApp is based on the case of KS Puttuswamy vs. Union of India. In 2 (2) of the new rules of 2021, if the government assumes that if someone complains, it will be possible to know who circulated the first message circulating on WhatsApp, the matter is difficult for WhatsApp. Because keeping the chat private between the person and the end-to-end encryption is of no value. And rivals like Telegram (it's a foreigner) get away with it.

This exit is an issue that was raised in the US in 2016-17 because of Apple. The FBI has sent a total of 11 court orders to uncover Apple's mechanized data on the phones of criminals caught in criminal investigations. The phones belonged to the shooters who carried out the massacre, who were locked up. Apple CEO Tim Cook rubbished that principle is the principle. We do not show data to anyone. Vat and Vachan's stories like Rasadhar of Saurashtra came to a head. In the end, the FBI dropped the case, saying the hacker must have been caught. But Apple's stand has led to a surge in user confidence in the United States.

That is why WhatsApp fights cases under Article 21, Article 12 of the Constitution and Section 7 of the IT Act. Earlier, the courts had a track record of consistently upholding the constitutional right to freedom of speech. These companies have done the same thing as the government has tampered with the new amendments by lightly violating Section 7. Simply put, like many countries, India has asked these foreign companies to appoint intermediaries. Whose number is public, and is a citizen of India with an address of India. This person listens to all complaints. Say the 'ombudsman' appointed by the companies. But like Lokpal, they became idols in political puppet shows

What if that happens? Section 7 has so far provided protection to the service provider platform, which has acted as a mediator. If a Champu complains by writing a paper threatening to kill another Chambu, Champu will be arrested. What would it be like to be a courier boy delivering a cover without knowing what is written inside?

The government is backing its agencies, so the platform wants to take on this responsibility. The call that came from the SIM card with the culprit of the blackmail case is like a company liability. The company has to keep a dahyundmaru platform by sifting everything by itself. Otherwise, the punishment of red eye. If the government itself complains, then the platform itself has the responsibility to disable / delete that material even before. A case was also registered in November 2009 for allowing a government agency to investigate. An IIT student posted an obscene video clip on an auction website bazidotcom to 'sell' - the crime branch of Delhi Police arrested Avinash Bajaj, CEO of Amazonnuma platform, along with the student, and arrested Sharad Digumati, the manager. Remember, there were no social networks at that time. Bajaj had to spend four days in Tihar Jail without any hesitation. He then filed a counter case.

It was argued that how could the website be the culprit in a two-person buyer-seller transaction? Its job is the medium. Why hold a hall tenant responsible for what happens inside? Unless there is prior knowledge or involvement in a suspicious matter. In 2012, after a full seven years, the Supreme Court acquitted Bajaj, who was found guilty of 'spreading pornography', and Section 7 came into existence. There is a fear that the protection cover will be removed in the current amendment. In which companies have to appoint Resident Grievance Officer, Chief Compliance Officer as Nodal Contact Person to regulate inappropriate content.

The character of Godren Greco in the Wall Street movie says M God is in the details. The government has increased the number of sedation charges in recent years. Journalists are caught up in this, which has been globally opposed to democratic values. It was written in this column about the knock made by Justice Rana while granting bail to Disha Ravin in a toolkit. If you look at the figures of the National Crime Records Bureau, 4 cases were registered in the Sedation Act in 2016, 21 in 2016, 20 in 2016 and 4 in 2016. Gradually increase. In an act designed by the British government to suppress the freedom struggle. The same act is the Unlawful Activity Prevention Act of UAP. There have been 301 cases in 2016, 114 in 2016 and 13 in 2016! This is a law that carries detention / custody for six months without charge. According to the new amendment, he will also be declared a terrorist without a trial! According to data from The Leaflet, chargesheets were filed later in only 15% of the sedation cases. The conviction rate was only 7.5%! In only 3% of the cases in UAPA, chargesheets were filed and only 2% of the 4% were convicted. What about the rest?

So the fear is that the youth sportsmen of Internet Freedom will run away from home instead of dying. The new law of 2021 directs action on offensive posts on the issue of 'Overnight and Integrity of India, Public Order, Friendly Relations with Foreign Countries'. Just as vulgar and erotic are not defined by law alone, this is not explained with a clear example. So anyone who says something he doesn't like can be made right and the crime will be detrimental to the national interest in the eyes of the people instead of 'dissent'! The examples given by the government are enough to make Twitter anti-India. Also, how is it that the data of millions of posts is neutralized every day? This requires the use of digital filters. For example, it is reasonable to say that the new B1.213 variant of Corona is not an Indian variant. But a data filtering machine catches words. So, if only two variants are caught in the Indian variant, even the posts of a government doctor who talks about enlightenment will be blown away!

One of the fears is that if people with a certain ideology are appointed as lower nodal persons, they will have a weapon in their hands to suppress what they do not like. Interpreters fear that those whose posts are blown up or blocked have no place to defend themselves. American companies are protected by the law granting freedom in America. So Twitter could blow up President Trump's account. But it has a public record of misinformation. The committee overseeing the case here is made up of members from the Ministries of Defense, Foreign Affairs, Information and Broadcasting, Law, Women and Child Development and Information Technology. Meaning the powers of censorship are with the government representatives of the winning party instead of the neutral court! Many of them even favor hate speech as they may have anti-constitutional personal religious-social beliefs regarding offensive content!

If the government's intention is to protect fake news and personal data, then the first law should be to make Aadhaar card a phone number for IDs on social networks. So that fake ideas are eliminated from trolling. The second task should be to create a fast track tribunal to prevent defamation of personal allegations. Third, increase the government's tax revenue by charging free internet, realizing that students can spend money on education and get merit-based scholarships. Navra Panchatiya will be filtered automatically! But if the government were to go to court for censorship, the Chinese censored Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber for visiting the Yakusuni shrine in Tokyo for meeting the Dalai Lama in Tibet in the episode "Friends Reunion".

Xing Thing

Agreeing with the politicians of the country is not mandatory to be a patriot.

(Edward Snowden)