The 'nation' will not settle down now and this is your 'state' demand!

- Spectrometer-Jay Vasavada

- How many contradictions were there before Gandhiji's repatriation and independence?

- 1909 India in which Pink is 'Yellow to British India' is Princely States.

Remember the pay meme (funny lines written with a visual photo)? In which a new expensive car has been seized by a herd of monkeys. Someone on the eagle roof, someone on the hood, someone checks the tires, someone widens the back seat. Two to three are attached to the steering wheel simultaneously. And the caption is 'Occupy, the crocodile won't move!'

Such is the nature of the administration of countries. Occupancy is done. By dreaming, by making owls, by showing the people the fear of the enemy created by the intoxication of any ideology or fake news, by seducing, by using the gun by the sword, by deception, by force, by intoxication of religious fanaticism, by economic gifts. But then when it comes to running, all the energy is wasted in hiding mistakes and incompetence. The nation is doomed, but those who are in a trance do not realize that survival is a matter of survival.

The straightforward and fresh specimen that has repeatedly mapped out India's history is Afghanistan. For the first time, the Taliban seized control of Chaos in the name of establishing order, but terrorism could do no good to the country or its people, except for the stigma of religious narrow-mindedness, and was repulsed by Americans thousands of kilometers away. For two decades, M's nuisance value has been taken over by an organization of bigoted minds like bullying and jihadi Islam. But there is a need to run the country.

As he did so, the spirit of forming a government of headless owls disappeared. Some experienced economists even had to stop by requesting. Pakistan had to seek help from China through the back door. But even though China was occupied by eccentric Mao on the strength of communism, there was no system of administration or progress until the rule of Shana Deng. Only Joshila Nara was afraid of the killer. In Pakistan today, the administration is not like that.

Even though the successful captain of the cricket team is the head of the country, what a mess the country will be where the cricket team has gone to the pits! Sometimes it seems that Sardar Saheb accepted the partition plan by going beyond Gandhi, it would be just a calculation to prevent such a 'viral infection' from spreading to a healthy body by cutting off the limb so that we could progress as a healthy democracy even though DNA has the same history!

But in the name of this division, many daffodils seem to be chanting the name of a united India today. But in the unveiling of last Wednesday's Shatdal Purti (dated 6-7-21), the first part of this article was seen with solid facts in the history of India, as India has never been like a map under a political regime today. There was a vast territory in which there was a monarchy. Not democracy. So the India that is in Kanishka's hands is gone when Prithviraj comes and goes, the map changes as the king changes. This has been happening all over the world. Otherwise, Greece would have ruled over the whole of Europe today!

The map of the Infect Kings is not entirely intact. Chakravarti Ashok could not rule Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala. Chandragupta's virtues were to some extent the same. Something or other would have been discounted. Take a look at the map of British India printed in 1905, which is easily found on the internet. The whole of India was not with the British alone. As much as 80 per cent of the land and 5 per cent of the population was written in the first part, even though those who compromised with the British power were in the possession of the princely states. (The Holi of the Kashmir question is burning from the harsh reality!) Even the republics did not survive. We can take pride in that. Like playing qualifying matches in the Football World Cup or participating in Wimbledon singles. But the winning score is zero. In Hero Worship, the election strategy has to be formulated on the basis of today's sore throat and still racial division. That is not the democratic concept.

That is why in the eyes of the British, call it a revolution and in our eyes, the freedom struggle. We have to read the Mahabharata. It does not matter to the stubborn here that wealth is plundered and creativity goes abroad. But his imaginary religiosity should not be offended. Even though it is so long slavery, dirt, poverty, crime, Gobachari all the forces have entered the holy land instead of the 'sinful west'! In the 'Manifesto' of November 1, 19, it means that the religious people were told that the government will no longer interfere in religious matters and social reform! There was also a lollipop that the government would make India a partner for the welfare of the people like Britain!

In this, the orthodox orthodox orthodox of every religion got a free field against the citizens (most of them in Bengal) who were becoming reformists by staying with the British! (Modernists from Narmad to Ramanbhai Nilkanth wrote in Gujarati against such old brainwashed people.) That is why 'Identity Politics' started again in India. Some of the kings and nawabs whose armies were kept by the British without being integrated into British India began to quarrel over regaining their old power. In the 19th century, many fought for the independence of their respective territories. There were more Muslim soldiers than Hindus at that time. This was immediately noticed by the far-sighted British.

In addition, 'Sir' Syed Ahmed from Aligarh made a clear diagnosis that if Hindus and Muslims do not have the habit of eating together in the same kitchen, then keeping them together in the army will lead to an explosion! Of course, this conclusion was also one-sided. The history of scholar historian Shambhu Prasad Harprasad Desai, published by the Somnath Trust, notes that there were Hindu soldiers, including Jats and Marathas, in Mohammad Ghaznavi's army! So Rana Pratap had Muslims in Shivaji's army and Hindus in Akbar's army! This is a new problem. Many people in India exchange loyalty enough for a job for money or security. Because it was not a concept like a nation.

During the long reign of the Muslims, some 'curiosities' came to India with the Christian missionaries of Victorian antiquity. Allready, the racism has been torn apart by the onslaught on science-feminism. Instead of learning new things, foreigners entered into the old false pride. After all, today, after so much education, scientific modernization, technological progress, the copy of narrowness instead of generosity is shattered. Many social problems arose.

The main thing that Babasaheb took a firm stand on is untouchability. Also, widow remarriage is not allowed in many places. Child marriage, Purdapratha, glorification of Satipratha, the move to take one's grandchildren abroad if one goes on a journey, what a turban, what a chandlo, what a system of worship .... Everyone wanted a zone for their region, language, denomination / religion, caste etc. Not India.

Seeing such nonsense, the British, who did not know Sanskrit and were not familiar with the glorious past, advocated prolonging the rule in India in the name of educating or reforming the people who considered India as an 'underdeveloped country'.

Remember that all these differences, misunderstandings and divisions of internal fencing were before Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on October 6, 19 in Putlibai's Kukhe! He grew up carrying the legacy of this entanglement in the atmosphere. Muslims, who then make up a quarter of the country's population and have long ruled Northwest India, want independence.

Hindus want him. In this, the upper castes want them, the dalits want them. The princely states want the princely states. Reformers want him. If the confusing equations of castes are too much for the claimants of the Chief Minister, then today the British would get a ready message that a third 'neutral' name would be lost by advancing the quarrel.

'Look, this country will end up fighting inside, it's better than we are!' In fact, seeing some advantages in English, it was written in Gujarati and people were saying 'Harakh now tu Hindustan'. Where did the foreign slavery of 'Latsaheb' fall when they were freed. Some liked the protection of the British police against social evils like alcohol, illiteracy, laziness, robbery, theft, fraud, lies. Robbery seemed to be more protection than fear of bandits. In this case, if you compare Princely State with British India, you will realize! There is a difference in who to worship religiously. The customs and traditions of each sect are different.

If you get freedom in this, you will get land. India is a country that has never existed in a democratic system before! The Congress was in a position to be considered an NGO founded by the British. The Sahiyara Manch was not counted by the people except the lawyers of some big cities, doctors, Parsis, the English-loving British. Syed Ahmed, who brought English education to Muslims, spoke of maintaining the British rule "for the benefit of Muslims" immediately after the Congress was formed in 1917.

The rest of the time of independence, everything will be done by Hindus. Earlier, Bharatendu Harishchandra had spoken the Hindi language written in pure Sanskrit Devanagari script. Three decades later, in 1918, a 'Justice Party' was formed in Tamil Nadu in the name of Dravida Asmita. Under the aegis of Periyar Ramaswamy, the anti-Hindi, anti-Arya Sanskrit influences on the Dravidian identity led to the emergence of the anti-Brahmin movement and the AIADMK parties that ruled there one after the other.

After studying in London and after the Satyagraha in South Africa for almost two decades, Gandhiji returned home in 1918 and only toured India for a whole year at the behest of Gopalakrishna Gokhale. Until then, all the viruses and bacteria that had written so far, which did not even exist as an independent country, had clung to India and reached multiple organ failure.

The cracks were clear to turn into a ditch. If the British vacate, who will give the key? There was no housewife. Either the key is lost in a clutter like 'Ma mane chammavadu'. Either fifty new countries, big or small, are added to the world map like the Arab world or Africa, or the mercenaries, the British, are left to fend for themselves.

One factor in this was the armed revolution. But it was impossible for the British power, which had won the First World War, to take up arms. (In the end, Hitler also failed.) Every such incident, big or small, strengthened the chains of slavery instead of the fire of freedom. In such a long time, it must have been understood that it was not possible to form a huge army for a 'nation called India'.

The rest ended up in arrest, jail, execution. Suppose chaos, chaos grows and America leaves Afghanistan, let the British go. What then? Weapons can be seized, but why the power? In a newly liberated country, the challenge is to organize the administration from one to the other. If the constitution is challenged to make laws. Looking at economic and military matters. Organizing education and health facilities.

If a brand new cabinet came to Gujarat now, there would not have been much upheaval. Joint governments came and went in the country and Gujral or Chandrasekhar or Charan Singh did not know much. Because the structure of day-to-day administrative administration is well-organized, it works in an automod mode. (So ​​the complaint is that he doesn't do it! But quit work - Manchado is there.) But think for two hours in peace and neutrality Bhagat Singh, Azad, Dhingra, Udyam Singh, Chafekar Bandhu, Jatin Das, Khudiram Bose, etc. If you think that there is a situation in your own party where there is still a rift in getting a universally accepted Chief Minister in 13 years, then what will happen at a time when the constitution is the name of the game, the countrymen have not seen it and white judges are judging in India according to British law. !

Back to Square One. How can a government be formed in a multicultural India where these wonderful and self-righteous revolutionaries are universally accepted? Easy to break, hard to connect and even harder to create! How do they get support from every section of the society? Why come to provide services relying on various experts? What is the difference between language and caste? How many experts are there in his team? And the question of a quarter of a billion. Freedom is achieved by killing by violence, killing and sabotage. If the violence of the British is not justified, then the increase in counter-violence is counterproductive. The whole of India is constantly burning in civil war like Syria-Afghanistan because the armed revolution has been approved!

Especially in a country like India. Because, due to lack of habit of democracy, there is a tendency to take the law into our own hands. If the edge has been worn out for centuries, then today there are fights to the point of killing where there is bitterness in small things. The mob kills the uniformed man. A judge was murdered in the Morning Walk recently. Leaders, gurus, prime ministers have been assassinated. The feud between the Dalit-Savarna or the castes becomes bloody. Knives are used in the usual brawls about mobiles or accidents. And, on issues like love marriage, the people of the house cut off the daughter.

Sharp lovers attack girlfriends. Here fashionable erotic photos - pictures - movies - are considered obscene but movies like Raktacharitra - Vasepur are considered action thrillers. The police also behave like gangsters in some areas and some defiant gangsters even attack the police station or the court. Husband and wife should be called their right. The era when teachers can raise their hands against children is still remembered by many with itching in the palm of their hand. Coverage of murder and corpses in the media is considered normal. Seeing while eating!

How can a people of 'violent' nature make a 'nation' in such a nature? Radhar, how to survive? That is why some 'service-minded' Englishmen used to say, 'You need us for your welfare. (Make us financially prosperous) We rule over you for your good! You can't walk without our horse! ' That is to say, even a Hindu-Muslim will not be able to live with a leader like Tilak who is considered a Hindu.

Fearing civil war, Lal, Bal and Pal did not support the armed revolution. Babasaheb Ambedkar, who made a glorious academic career out of great sorrow, was clear that the rights of Dalits in the Golden Hindu Nation were at stake. Did not want to hold further talks without a written explanation. So the 5 princely states were not under the direct influence of the British crown, so they had to restore their status to the army again.

Making an internal explanation is a different matter. The rest is his kingdom, his country! It is different that some were just like villages. There were only 5 kingdoms in Kathiawar! The leaders were big and there were differences of opinion. A back example: Subhash Babu did not mix with Sardar Vallabhbhai but with his brother Vitthalbhai and in case of disagreement, the case reached the court case against him from Sardar! Shyamaprasad Mukherjee, an ardent Hindu, did not mix well with Subhash Babu's supporters even though he was a Bengali.

Bhagat Singh himself expressed his grief from jail and told the Congress father to follow in the footsteps of your commander (Gandhi) (and even fasted!) The Sikhs wanted an independent past. And there was no talk of women's freedom in the country. Subhash Babu bravely went ahead to form an international alliance, but it should not be forgotten that his army was defeated by Japan-Germany.

Even if India becomes independent amidst all these backgrounds, that independence will not last long due to lack of inclusive leadership. Like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Myanmar did not survive. Border states become playgrounds for powerful superpowers. Lord (M) Birkenhead, who later became the Minister of Indian Affairs in Britain, lamented that "there is no consensus among the leaders seeking India's independence, this country cannot have its own constitution!"

Father of the Nation Bapu turned 150 years old when our independence was 9 years old! Remember these two parts before the final part of this trilogy. (Previous Uncovered, Current Spectrometer) Otherwise, the saint with the potty will not understand what he did. Many Ghogharbilada Ghelchandras who have chosen Kapatar will chew on any of these 'Baap's' without understanding the opinions of things like Swami Shraddhanand or Chopla. But he does not have the vision to study the facts as much as to see a big event and a 'large picture'. That number will be unveiled, unveiled at Shatdal in the final part next Wednesday. Danke Ki Chot on how the world gives credit for India's independence to Gandhibapu despite World War II, and why he kept the word 'Swaraj'!

Fast forward

I don't like to threaten or block Godse worshipers on social networks defending the violence of Nathuda Ganda, a terrorist murderer who went to the point of killing an unarmed old man just for the sake of differences. If Godsegiri had believed in murder for a different opinion, would all of them have been living to talk nonsense about Bapu? Even today's freedom of opinion is a gift of the democratic values ​​cultivated by Gandhiji!