The Science of Plane Crash: A Crowd Flying in the Sky

- At a glance - Hershal Pushkarna

- Suicide NoseDive of Chinese Passenger-2 Plane refreshes the question: Which of the following 'Manzi' should be given the helm of the sinking 'Naiya' of Bharakash plane?

Although the incident took place a day ago, it has to be cited here as a background. On March 21, 206, a Chinese Boeing-737 type passenger plane was flying at an altitude of 20,000 feet. The direction was towards a province called Guangzhou. Who knows what happened to the current flight, but the front of the plane started tilting downwards. Just a few seconds ago a plane moving in a straight line in the sky caught the direction of the ground. Even if a mechanical defect occurs in a skyscraper, it gradually loses altitude moving in a straight line before crash landing. But China's Boeing-737 plane started nose-diving in a vertical line of about 90 degrees with its nose stem. It fell like a meteor falling from the sky. The speed of the fall was so great that in just two and a half minutes it fell to the ground at a distance of 20,000 feet. Fierce flames erupted, in which all 12 passengers were immediately consumed.

The Boeing-737 passenger Pleiman, weighing about 15 tons, made a kamikazi dive in a vertical line like the Japanese fighter jets of World War II. However, this is not the first time this has happened. Ditto has had two such accidents in the past — and both of them have crashed into Boeing-737 series aircraft.

3

The world's first similar aircraft, the Flyer-1, was flown by brothers Wilbur Wright and Orville Wright in the United States on December 16, 1908. However, two years before the flight of the Wright brothers, a German pilot named Gustav Waffethead had made a successful flight. But the name of the right brother was recorded in the book of chronicles of Naseeb Balihari or Biman Aviation. Poor Gustav Vaneithead was pushed to the margins of neglect.

The first flight of the Wright brothers on the shores of Kitty Hawk in the United States was only 15 seconds long, during which the distance covered by the plane was not more than 5 meters. Even so, owning one is still beyond the reach of the average person. Wright's brother Mykangala 'Flyer-1' led to more and more giant planes. In January 1956, the Boeing 707 passenger plane, which weighed three and a half times more than the Flyer 1, happily radically changed the equations of air travel.

At the beginning of the twentieth century, scientists like Lord Kelvin believed that a plane many times heavier than air could not be a skyscraper. But the 115-ton Boeing-707 aircraft blatantly denied that. The wings of aeronautics have continued to grow long and wide, from the time this revolutionary passenger took the world into the jet age to the present day. Thanks to the vast wings of technology, today around 1,15,000 flights of passenger planes are successfully operated every day around the world.

3

The Boeing-707 was the first generation passenger aircraft to fly in January 1957. Almost all the controls in the play were manual. From take-off to landing, the pilot was in charge of the aircraft. Some years later, when the time came to commute, some of the management responsibilities were handed over to the commuter station in the cockpit of the plane, with the intention of easing the work of the ray pilot. This change was made by the European company Airbus in the 19th. He built the world's first commuter water-powered aircraft, the A320, using a fly-by-wire system. The wings have been shown solely to give a sense of proportion. In order to carry out these functions in a colorful manner, the communicator used the aircraft's electronic devices to constantly obtain narrow data such as the speed of the platoon, the celestial height, the direction of the wind blowing out, and the speed.

Airbus' fly-by-wire system crashed. But the company did not consider it appropriate to throw away the millions of dollars worth of aircraft and the precious lives of its passengers. So he created a system that bypassed the fly-by-wire system, in which the reins of the aircraft fell into the hands of the pilot. It was planned that the pilot would immediately take over the management of the aircraft if the current flight failed to make any calculations.

3

Several more years passed. Communities become more 'intelligent' than ever before. The sensitivity of electronic sensors also increased nowhere. As a result, Comulator was given a major responsibility to operate aircraft under the flight management system in aircraft manufacturers such as Boeing and Airbus, which did not create second-generation passenger planes.

So far so good. But donkeys were assumed to be wiser than potters when the 'sensible' nickname 'Artificial Intelligence' was nailed in the 'intelligent' camouflage. Attempts were made to shift as much of the aircraft's operations as possible to the head of the state-of-the-art crew. Earlier, the pilot had to rectify the mistake of Kamuya Ter, but now the aircraft manufacturers wanted to change the situation by 180 degrees. As a result, more sophisticated commuters, electronic sensors and commuter software began to find a place in the cockpit. In 2012, Boeing, an American company, developed a special system called MCAS. (MCAS full name is not quoted here as it is long, confusing and unnecessary). The system is fitted to the Boeing-737 MAX series passenger seats.

The aircraft in this series had extremely balcony angina. At certain stages of operation, when the thrust of the engine is increased, the front of the aircraft, in response to an unusually high elevation, begins to move upwards, forming a sharp angle. It doesn't matter if the passenger plane, which weighs hundreds of tons, climbs into the sky at an angle of 18 to 15 degrees. If the angle starts to increase more than that, the heavier body cannot stay afloat as the air pressure under the wings of the plane decreases. The plane seems to be moving reverse. If the peacock is not straightened in time, the plane loses its flight ability and stalls.

The Boeing-737 MAX was equipped with the MCAS system to avoid the hazardous situation. The system's commutator automatically moves when the Play 7's head is raised abnormally. As shown in the drawing here, the stabilizer of the wing adjacent to the tail of the aircraft changes the angle of the wing as required. After doing so, the elevated peacock becomes parallel again and the play does not proceed in a straight line.

3

The technological solution that Boeing devised was effective, but so was its implementation. On October 8, 2016, the Lion Air Boeing-737 MAX of Indonesia took off from Jakarta with a total of 18 people on board. After take-off, it climbed to an altitude of 35,000 feet — and then the plane's MCAS system suddenly became active. The system mistakenly assumed that the front of the plane was too high and the tail stencilizer wings were bent accordingly. The moro seemed to be straight, but the stabilizer wings remained bent. This caused the plane to lose altitude suddenly and very quickly.

The pilot attempted to lift the moro again through the control column, but the plane's MCAS system did not respond. Boeing did not make a provision to bypass the system and hand over control of the aircraft to the pilot. As I said before, donkeys were wiser than potters. The pilot's natural intelligence versus the MCAS system's Artificial Intelligence's yardstick finally came to victory. He hit the plane with a nosedive. Within 15 minutes of take-off, he plunged into the Java Sea with a total of 12 people. No one survived.

Lessons Boeing learned about the serious consequences of relying too heavily on intelligent commuters. Unfortunately that was not the first lesson. On March 10, 2016, it bloomed once. The aircraft is the same: Boeing-737 MAX! An Ethiopian airliner from Addis Ababa departed with 157 people on board. At the time of take-off, I hit the MCAS system in it. The angle of the stabilizer wings was so sharp that the plane began to move towards the ground instead of the sky and hit the ground at a speed of 1,100 kilometers per hour. The strong body of aluminum was crushed like paper in a tremendous shock. Out of a total of 153 unfortunates, no one survived.

In the wake of these two disasters, airlines around the world narrowed down the 'wings' of their Boeing-737 MAX aircraft. Boeing abolished the MCAS system from all aircraft in that series. The company spent about પ 3.5 billion.

3

The Boeing-737 was also a Chinese passenger plane that crashed like a meteor on March 31, 2008, but its model was NG (next generation) series; Not MAX. Boeing has not equipped such a model with the MCAS system. This is why the nosedive of a Chinese plane confuses anthropologists. It is not yet known (until March 3) that the pilot's side made a mistake that hit the aircraft's commuter. Whatever the case, the catastrophes of Lion Air of Indochina, Ethiopian Airlines and now China Eastern Airlines have drawn the world's attention to a complex question:

To what extent should a manjhi named a commuter be allowed to take the helm of a sinking ship 'Naiya'? Suppose the entire command is handed over to him, then a question like that movie song arises, if Manzi sinks the boat ... who will save him?