
- Antaryatra-Dr. Sarvesh Q. Vora
- Hardly one or two of the so-called religious have faith in the heart. Alas, let alone the matter of faith, the eagerness to find God is barely there!
On the other hand, animals like dogs are much easier to teach by imitation. Teach the monkey to salute so that he salutes very systematically! There is no difference between the monkey-dogs and the "religious" and so-called religious) fanatics who create a rigid, rigid casteism around great men. These animals usually do not salute anyone, but if the ring master or madari makes some sign, then they salute!
Notoriety for religious fanaticism and small-mindedness gave him an opportunity to speak compassion, generosity, kindness, non-violence to a communal mob. Verses of devotional poets of other sects quoted in the lecture. The talk was about generosity, kindness, non-violence, but if it was said in front of a poet of another sect, then it is considered a joke! The lecture was going on and the letter arrived. People will not like the mention of saints of other sects here! Here Meera, Narasimha Naatbahar considered!
The condition of these people is like animals dancing at the signal of Madari. Animals are still forgivable, deserving of pity because they do not have the zazy intellect, but these communal animals do monkey hunting with open intelligence, all human-intelligence.
Based on the average expectation of God-fearing or non-evil, unfaithful, hypocritical behavior, it was assumed that "religious" people are more trustworthy. A huge mistake was made here. "Religion" came to be understood as an element with faith in God. This was a monstrous mistake. And the so-called religion is a matter of herds, external sectarianism because faith is a purely personal matter. Out of ten thousand so-called religious people who are listening to devotional talk in a communal place of worship, hardly one or two have faith in their hearts. Alas, let alone the matter of faith, the eagerness of searching for God is barely there! Millions of years ago there was a need to break the equation that labeling a religion means a good man and now there is a need to put up banners in loud letters in temple after temple, mosque after mosque, church after church, thief and thief saying, "Generosity or gentility with the label of religion or so-called religion. Don't make the stupid mistake of joining.''
An outspoken atheist is more credible if he declares that he does not believe in God or a divine governing force, and as long as he is not obsessed with imposing his beliefs on others, because his belief in disbelief in God is frank, self-possessed. What he says is not to propagate any mob ideology.
Indeed there is no faith in God, there is no faith in some deity but "it is our communal duty that we should all bark when some street dog barks at one of us".
Those who wear such faith are really self-deceivers and if the fragrance of faith in God remains, those who wear such religion will turn cruel, treacherous and naga in no time.
When a person is an atheist but is open-minded, the open-mindedness is more important than the atheism, because the hypocrisy of theism is a ticking time bomb, like a house of cards. A shack of atheism built with openness is more durable, more reliable than a huge palace of self-deprecating and mob-driven theism.
Sectarianism and the customers of the clothed, false, hypocritical religious faith still today, even though they number in the millions, remember that the plank is being removed from under their feet. The new generation is no longer ready to consider communalism and alleged religious loyalty as synonymous with gentility.
Comments
Post a Comment
What you think give us your idea about this article we publish your words on our site