Censorship on social media

- British comedian Baron Cohen, nominated for Oscars and Golden Globes, launches an acid attack on social media's "Silicon Six" to spread chaos and chaos around the world.

- Vividha-Bhaven Kutchi

- If Facebook had been in the 1930s, Hitler would have run the Goebbels campaign with 30-second advertisements saying he had a solution for the Jewish community: Baron Cohen

Bri Tish comedian and screenplay writer Sara Baron Cohen has been nominated for Oscars, Golden Globe and Emmy. Cohen, in a stand-up comedy show with his script, satirizes "Silicon Valley Six" as a deadly figure for world peace, as well as whipping speeches. He also calls Bill Gates a petal. Silicon Six includes Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Pretty Pichai, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, YouTube CEO Susan Wojciech and Twitter's founder and CEO Jack Dawsey. They are able to make a living, but unfortunately their minds are so full of commercialism and consumerism that even if chaos spreads in the universe, their hair will not turn.

Especially if Facebook, Google, WhatsApp and Twitter are not controlled, the countries where democracy prevails will slip into the hands of those who will create havoc. Everyone knows what the future holds for the world. But those who are moving forward with a well-organized machinery with a definite agenda rather than sitting idle are succeeding in spreading lies and establishing lies to be true. . A team of psychologists and technocrats who specialize in how to brainwash citizens stops paying high salaries to those who have such missions.

Silicon Six provides them with a platform for this. The management boards of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and WhatsApp know that anyone who posts this does not do so under the guise of freedom of expression, but with a single ideology, individual, and leadership. Has a mission to overthrow or establish ethnicity, religion or theory. Most of these posts are fake, tampered with or twisted as expected by picking up special pages of history. If this poison continues to circulate like a lie for the world, then the multi-billion dollar business of Silicon Six will continue.

Cohen says a campaign was launched two years ago in the United States and Europe to denounce Hitler's Holocaust, but no such incident took place. The Holocaust is a fabrication. At the same time, blogs, videos and articles supporting this post have re-emerged on social media with great logic and cunning. If you keep manipulating a single lie very cleverly, you will believe the lies to be true. " Silicon Six, including Zuckerberg, knew that this was propaganda that was terribly tampering with human history.

I provide a free platform for anyone who wants to say or write anything. Any opinions on any subject should be welcomed. ' He had to block a post that created a soft corner for Hitler after Zuckerberg's attitude caused a worldwide uproar. Cohen even says in his show: "Silicon Six" has such a light and brutal business instinct that if his companies were operating in the 180's, he would have a solution to the problems of the Jewish community in the world. I would run ads.

Goebbels used Facebook and WhatsApp or Twitter to spread the word that it is necessary for the welfare of the world to call for the end of Zion by giving money to Hitler. It is possible that the constant brainwashing of a significant community led to Hitler's talk of being misled by such propaganda.

With the rise of social media in the world, 21st century human beings are becoming more backward, hostile, hostile and narrow-minded than they really are. One man looks at another man with suspicion. Heretics are worshiped. The mop is turned on one's good contribution and the effort to establish the vile ideology as the savior of the world continues unabated and social media is responsible for such an environment. Who to lift, who to throw, who to take out grandchildren is a game of psychosis played on social media.

Such a monstrous monster should not be allowed to spread hatred in a world like Nandanvan under the guise of freedom of speech. No. In the same way, the panel of experts can know what kind of missions, agendas and debates are going on in the world for the purpose which is not beneficial for the human race. After reading the fact check in Google, the reader of the post knows that the suspicious post is fake. It is easier for the companies to filter the fact by checking its authenticity and intention before such a post is posted for the first time.

Why don't social media companies block posts that scare the world, spread insecurity or spread violence and hatred? But companies don't do that, on the contrary, their business is in it if this post keeps multiplying. New posters are added to it. These elements, which provide a definite distorted goal, flood the coffers by advertising to keep social media companies happy. Remember that this is not a business of 'Freedom of Speech' but of 'Freedom of Reach' (Eichber means to deliver maximum misinformation to the people and also belongs to Eber i.e. groups that make millions of dollars for social media companies).

The BJP government in India wants control of social media in such a way that we do not want to ban anyone's post. There must be freedom of speech and expression. However, if we feel that certain posts are intended to disturb the peace of the country and the aim is to spread ideas and campaigns such as sedition, we need to know that our democratic tradition is not endangered. Who is the first to send that post? Facebook has this mechanism. They can know in one click who is the first poster.

Social media companies are only in the business of posting and advertising in this way, so they must know even for payment. The central government demands that social media companies open their offices in India with a team of technocrat employees so that, when needed, information can be obtained about the first person, organization or group posting harm to the interests of such a country. The central government has also assured that we will not arbitrarily encroach on the freedom of anyone who is haphazard for personal gain. Behave very judiciously. Yes, one thing is clear that the government can take legal action against such elements.

On the other hand, the now skeptical class of the central government fears that the government will take legal action against the individuals and ideological groups who have questioned their governance. Social media companies put up strong resistance and pushed the Indian government not to give in. Not only that, in the court of India, these foreign companies filed a case against the move of the Central Government. Eventually, social media companies felt that the days of lockouts would come if the ban was lifted, as India's proposed market is worth as much as India's 150 million population, if you add up to the US and European countries.

All these companies are set up with the main objective of capturing the world's mobile phone, gadgets, service providers, social media, 5T, OTT. Another reason is that China, which has the largest population in the world, has its own social media "WeChat" and "Weibo". India has also launched its own 'Koo' platform against Twitter, which now adopts the Chinese model. From the BJP leaders to the workers going on this platform, there is a tone from within.

Control of social media in China is held by government-owned headquarters. First of all this post is received by this headquarters. In this way the censored or filtered post is placed in the public media. The personal information of each sender of the post is forwarded to the address of the post only after the address is verified. Those who post anti-Jinping government or anti-Chinese culture cannot go to court and go straight to jail. Those who oppose it are subjected to harsher punishments. Online messaging, portals and operations are done in Chinese only. Over the last few years, questions have been raised in different countries about the way the medium works like Facebook. In addition to China, countries like Iran, Austria, Bangladesh, Egypt, North Korea, Malaysia have banned the social media of foreign companies. While in a dozen countries, including the UAE, France and Germany, they now have the same restrictions and rights that India has demanded. The names and addresses of the post holders are kept in the IT department of their government.

Now, artists, thinkers and activists like Cohen, whom we talked about at the beginning of the article, are coming out against the world. So much so that social media is proving to be a nuisance to 90 per cent against 80 per cent utility. What we really got out of it is to introspect that someone sprinkled bhurki and made us his devotees. We have become addicted to social media so it is difficult but if not inevitable, going to social media once in six hours a day can bring a lot of peace of mind and the alternative is to use quality time for us and our family to prosper.