Is it true that no one belongs to anyone in life or is it true that nothing belongs to anyone?

- Guftego - Dr. Chandrakant Mehta

- If you take the negative meaning of 'no one belongs to anyone in life', then such aversion to karma is called palyanism. The outcome of the relationships of relatives received or received according to destiny is influenced only by the karmas of pre-birth

Is it true that no one belongs to anyone in life or is it true that nothing belongs to anyone?

Questioner: Naishadh Derashree, 30 Nalanda Society, T.B. Opposite Hospital, Jamnagar (Saurashtra)

The scriptures have emphasized that the calendar of when someone will come into his life and when he will depart, has some incomprehensible power. Saints have often tried to persuade people through hymns and storytellers through religious-spiritual teachings. It has become very popular to say, "We have met all the debts, we have been blessed with the blessings of a birth, we have come and gone like this, this is the fair of petals".

Destiny has been given special consideration in Hindu scriptures. In this, for the happiness and sorrow of man, for love and danger, relatives, friends or other relationships are subject to karma. That is, they are obtained according to the creation of destiny. According to the Samit Karmas, the human body is given to a person to suffer as much as he is destined to suffer as a result of his destiny. According to the "principle of karma", parents, women and children also get the same amount of destiny. You are born at home to your parents and you get the same facilities as per your destiny. We do not have to choose which parents are to be born there.

Destiny does not have a 'council' system. Otherwise man can request to give birth to a millionaire, a billionaire there. Debt bonds are destined for man in this lifetime. Son-daughter-wife Lakshmi pursues the cycle of attaining power, glory or poverty and enmity according to the destiny of 'whatever is written in the destiny of the one who reaches it at that time'. As soon as the bond is fulfilled, man is freed from worldly relations. This means that you get only a part of the auspicious and inauspicious deeds that have accumulated in the pre-birth in the form of happiness and sorrow. Destiny karma does not have a system of 'concession'.

The nature of man is discussed in detail in 'Srimad Bhagavad Gita'. Man's nature comes only with the imprint of his pre-existing rites. In that way man can be of sattvic, rajasic or tamasic nature. Otherwise in earthly life there would be people of tamasic nature like Duryodhana, Kansa, Ravana. That is why human relationships survive according to the onslaught of the relationship. According to the rites of pre-birth, a man feels his own, if he is a Parku.

No friend, no enemy. The relationship of the world develops, breaks, connects and ends accordingly. That is why man mistakenly considers worldly relations. Only a person who has a spiritual understanding of worldly relations can say non-attachment like Narasimha Mehta despite the death of his son, daughter and wife, "Well done Bhangi Janjal, we will happily rejoice, Shri Gopal."

Reducing the negative meaning that no one belongs to anyone in life, if a person tries to become detached from relationships and worldly deeds, such detachment is called escapism. It just means no one else. The consequences of the relationships of the relatives received or received by destiny are influenced only by the deeds of pre-birth and after suffering the fruits of such deeds, they depart from the life of man.

If not, would Dronacharya or Bhishma have written the death by hand to Arjuna? So the best way is to be free from the attachment of relationships and to do one's duty with restraint. In the collection 'Mukta Pushpanjali Strota', Kaushala Ketan, Manoj and Bhavin's learned father Devshankar Dixit have presented in a Sanskrit verse that the futility of worldly relations and what man has achieved on this earth will remain on the earth even if it does not belong to him.

According to the Gujarati sentimental translation of the Sanskrit verse "Dhanani Bhumau, Yashvasva Gausht", "When a human being closes his eyes forever, the wealth accumulated by Sarai during his life remains on the earth. Does not go with life. The animals are bound in the code, the wife also leaves the body carrying such a cremation to the door of the house. Relatives return from the cemetery. The body cannot move beyond the cheetah while the life moving forward alone on the path to the afterlife is accompanied by its good narcissistic deeds. A human being whose life is degraded by narcissistic deeds should live a life that is supported by good deeds.

Saint Kabir also warned in a hymn "Hari bin, Tore more manva apna koi nahi" - that man should not be engrossed in worldly relations. Tulsidasji also says. "No, this is not yours, this is my God, this is the kingdom, this is the water of God, this is the place of God, this is the grain of God." The first verse of Ishavasya Upanishad which has Gujarati translation. "Ish is the kingdom. All about this world. The truth is explained by the fact that in the desire to suffer renunciation, the wealth of others belongs to others. The 'Mystery of Death' explains that the gross body is obtained from the parents while the subtle body is obtained from the past karmas. So the easiest way to self-realization is to become ego-free in this birth and to make the mind divine. You live in the world, but do not make the mind-heart the world is the secret of life.

Thinking from a philosophical point of view, it must be said that no-one does not mean that worldly relations are influenced by the rites of pre-birth and have been achieved to enjoy karma. That is why one should try to become a Janakavidehi by remaining in the body, leaving the same ignorance as I do. Man is free to do karma but is free to enjoy the fruits of karma. So if you want to be free from bondage, you should do karma without any cost. In the 'Principle of Karma' it is rightly said that,

As much infatuation with the soul for relatives as it does when leaving the body. This infatuation is man's ignorance, avidya. Citing the words of Lord Swaminarayan, Naranarayana Dev was greeted by Sahajanandaswamy's supreme worshiper P.P. During a discussion, Mahaacharya Tejendra Prasadji said, "Lord Sahajanand Swami has said that just as you have forgotten the parents, sons and daughters of the previous birth in ignorance, so should you forget the parents, sons and daughters of this birth by knowing them." ''

In fact, 'nobody's' is true according to the principle of karma. The fact that nothing belongs to anyone is also philosophically true. Man has a sense of 'ownership' by nature, so he cannot see the omnipresence of God. How many cemeteries are filled with the ashes of egoistic people who would not be able to run this world without me. So the truth is that man should live a life of restraint, ethics, non-attachment and sattvic attitude in order to enlighten the living.