Conflict between Center and States over IAS - IPS in Civil Service Management

- People-oriented guidance - H.S. Patel IAS (Retd.)

- Created by Sardar Patel

- The constitution requires that the organs of government maintain the limits of the legislature and the executive federation

Continued from the past

But in the aftermath of which the Central Government extended the services of the Chief Secretary for three months, the Center directed the Chief Secretary to appear before the Personnel Department of the Government of India in which it appears that - no consultation or consent of the State Government has been sought and Chief Secretary Bandhopadhyay At the end of the retirement period - resigned from the extension given for three months and the Chief Minister of the state appointed him as their Principal Advisor. With this, the Central Government filed a case under Section 41 of the Disaster Management Act, treating Bandhopadhyay as Dereliction of Duty and under this provision, the guilty officer can be punished from 1 year to 3 years. However, an offense under disaster management does not occur at first glance given the nature of the case. But it is also clear that if All India Services le Dignity is to be maintained, Bandhopadhyay should not even accept the services of the Chief Minister's Adviser after his resignation. Thus, in view of all these matters, it is clear that as per the provisions of All India Service Rules 3 (1), the state has not been consulted or consented to before appointing Bandhopadhyay on deputation to the Center.

Thus, the noble spirit of Sardar Saheb which created the IAS between the states and the Center. / IPS The structural arrangements that have been made are ridiculous. The balance between the legislature and the executive as per the provisions of the constitution is not maintained in the federal structure. He is a perfect example of this case.

Why is the All India Service IAS now called 'Steel Frame'? When Sardar Saheb addressed the first batch of IAS on April 19, he said that you should not be afraid or prejudiced. Favor of working for the service of the country and keeping this service away from political interference as well as political parties will come and go in the regime but the service officials have been given Articles 302 to 311 of the Constitution which have been included. This ensures that service officers cannot be removed unless the procedure is followed. Many members of the Constituent Assembly objected when these provisions were to be introduced in the Constitution but due to the firmness and determination shown by Sardar Saheb, security and permanence were maintained for public service officers so that no one could be dismissed without following departmental inquiry or procedure. For the next two decades there was a harmonious relationship between the rulers and the executive, the Legislature and the Executive. In the history of Indian politics, after the split of the Congress in the 19th century, its effects gradually began to come on the administration and the practice of appointing supposed officials began. At the same time, the ruling party also contributed to the freedom struggle. With the completion of Yhirchiuh, a generation of leaders, the factor of authoritarian politics was widely added, with the most important cadre in the executive being IAS. And IPS. The officers of this cadre, starting from the district, are at the forefront of the state and the center and the officers of the All India Service have also been instrumental in the progress of the country. But I.A.S. / IPS

Due to the interference of the rulers in the posting and transfer of officers or the appointment of pliable officers, the Legislature i.e. the rulers and the executive have been created and so the number of pro-government officials is increasing day by day. So that Sardar Saheb from the concept I.A.S. Presented by the All India Service, it is imperative that the rulers and officials adhere to the noble spirit in the interest of the country and that the laws of consultation and consent provided to the states in the framework of federalism at that time be fully complied with.