For the first time, he created the 'Nation' of civil democracy, so Gandhiji is the 'Father of the Nation'

- Thousands of years old Indian 'civilization'

- Unveiled-Jay Vasavada

- Criticism alone does not change relatives from within

- 'I do not agree with clerics or priests who do not define Islam after Muhammad or Christianity after Jesus. Religion changes over time. ' - Gandhiji

Who called the village Dhiji the Father of the Nation?

The answer. After a letter of condolence after Kasturba's death, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose on July 8, 19 on Azad Hind Radio in Rangoon, Japan, expressing some doubts about the success of the 'Quiet India' movement and seeking blessings for his fight for the Azad Hind Army! Exit words "Father of our Nation, in Holy War of India's Liberation, We Ask for Your Blessings and Good Wishes!"

It is to be remembered that Subhash Babu showed as much respect to Gandhiji as the Father of the Nation, the Father of the Nation by staying away from him and his ideology when he had to resign from the post of Congress President! By writing such half-heartedly, the crooks who go to portray Gandhiji as an unjust person with Subhash Babu, what is the poison of their prejudices against Gandhi that Subhash Babu himself did not have, but today, by twisting WhatsApp, he obeys the incompleteness of those two codes! And Subhash Babu called Gandhiji the Father of the Nation with full understanding. But to understand that we have to go to Bhagat Singh.

Those who stumble upon Gandhiji's non-violence without reading the original Satpatis of their original Dadharangi mentality keep Bhagat Singh-Subhash Babu together while forwarding borrowed poems like Kitno Goli Khai Thi. Originally, the crazy God-worshiping Hindutvaists do not have any revolutionary icons except Veer Savarkar of the first half (who wrote an apology in the second half, sitting at home on a pension is a documented history). That is why backward bogs with the idea of ​​forwarding a fantasy that has photos of Bhagat Singh-Subhash Babu instead of Gandhiji on the note!

So those Uthelpanis did not take the trouble to read Bhagat Singh's 'New Leaders or Different Thoughts' printed in 'Kirati' for the youth of Punjab at the age of only 18 at the age of 18. In which the revolutionary Bhagat Singh openly criticized the revolutionary Subhash Babu and compared and praised Nehru!

Ask why At a meeting in Mumbai, Bose was the speaker and Jawaharlal was the program chairman. In it, Subhash Babu recalled India's golden past and said, "We are the best, and we have brought a great message to the world." Sarfarosh Bhagat Singh, who was a communist ideologue by nature and did not even believe in God, found this Subhash Babu's words antiquated. 'If we had all this, where did it go? Property can be looted. He asked such questions as 'Don't think'. Bhagat Singh liked Nehru's speech in which Nehru said, "Every country feels that it is special, and its past is unique." But we have to leave all this now and build a new India of tomorrow. ' (New India, you know!)

Bhagat Singh wrote that Subhash Babu wanted to defeat the British so that it was not ours. They have come from the West. 'But Nehru (read here, Gandhi. Because Nehru was echoing his ideas!) That we are capable of ruling ourselves and through this we will bring a new social revolution and break old stereotypes! In Summing Up, Bhagat Singh writes to the Punjabi youth, "We have nothing new to say except nationalist talk. But the new generation needs intellectual nourishment. (Intellectual Narration!) For which he has to go to Nehru (again, meaning Gandhi) and understand the true meaning of revolution! '' Would?

In the last two installments of 'Uncovered' (2/3) and 'Spectrometer' (9/10) we have seen a lot in a few, including the solid base, that India's problems were Hindu-Muslim or untouchability-economic exploitation was before Gandhi's birth. The split was already there. No matter what the Chakravarti emperor is, complete India has not been in anyone's possession. If the north is more, the leaves will be shorter in the south and vice versa. There was no such political map of India. Apart from fighting among themselves, it is not the people who become 'free' but the princely states. And the most victorious Mughals, Sikhs and Marathas were even defeated by the British. Apart from British India, there was no army in the 9 Princely States. In the sophistical controversies, the majority of the Hindu people have become mentally enslaved in curiosity, narrow-mindedness and sectarianism and casteism. Gandhi, who could not live with Hindus and Muslims, was already at loggerheads with Jinnah. The variety that appears today was the food and drink. There was also a fight for language. Tamil Nadu started protesting against Hindi culture in 1918. The British used to say in Tumakhi that Indians could not formulate their own constitution. Explaining to him to become a British Empire just like administrative ease like begging bread.

And to know that the study of how Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation of India, who has lived for millions of years, asks such nonsense is not beyond TV serials. Because civilization and nation are very different concepts. Gandhiji himself has openly stated that the civilization of India was ancient, using the definitions like Gita, Ganga, Gai. But nowhere from Hastinapur to Pataliputra was there such a thing as 'Indian Nation'. There was an era of monarchy. A civic identity like 'Indian' did not exist. (Where is it today? The identity of a local or caste com religion is greater than that of an Indian!) There was no system to raise or voice for justice. If the king is sensible, valued, prajavatsal and generous, then fortunately the people have the benefit of well-being, but if it is arranged like a blessing, then another king has to be brought. No right to direct to the public.

That is why India has seen a democratic constitution under the banner of North-South-East-West, Hindu-Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Golden Dalit, male and female civil system only after 19/120. It is a half-truth that the 19th was the Dominion status. The Act that liberated India was a different one and was a system that was adopted in practical terms to set up and implement a new system. None of this is leased to the British nor do our laws have to be approved in Britain today. The Commonwealth is a voluntary club. No slavery membership.

And the one who gave the idea of ​​India for this Nation not only impressed others, but also inspired Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi as a Team Leader and Team Builder Both! No one else! That is why with the tactful Chabrak Gandhiji Freedom 'Freedom', he was more concerned with preparing the people of India than with the consent of the British for the use of the word 'Self-Rule'. Naturally, a smart political leader would never tell anyone the strategy behind his slogan. Selfish leaders do not say everything openly! Gandhiji had no self-interest (the last name of the ruling Gandhi family was Parsi, yes not Muslim, the full-fledged Parsi came from Feroze Gandhi later on. Gandhi did not 'arrange' his children anywhere), but foresight is a must. If you don't keep a handful of lakhs tied, it will not be possible to draw a large population. The life of the hashtag trend of Bhadarwana bhindas, who continue to criticize Gandhiji using the net for free, has a lifespan of 8 hours like a fly. Gandhiji had to paint the country's population without any net or phone or special media, in which apart from British India, more than five hundred and fifty princely states had a Muslim population of 4% at that time - in one color for a brand new destination. Did not just have to fight the battle of revolution. He also had to pay attention to social reform, education, omnipotence, welfare and ethics!

What he did was his greatest victory, which stunned the minds of the world. Do you trust the intelligence of Mobilemachadu Taporitin or the Brain of the Millennium Albert Einstein by licking the books of Neuda Ganda (a bastard killer Ram doesn't deserve a word like God) without reading a book on Gandhiji? So you should know Einstein's selection. What work Einstein did, thousands of foreign giants like Charlie Chaplin from Rolla in Rome. It is easy to make fun of Gandhiji living in Birla-Bajaj's bungalow. But try to win his respect as much as living in the house of a man of dissenting opinion. A whole life will be spent in one go!

Fighting for Swaraj on many fronts, Bapu was in his forties when he came to India. In the 9 years of independence, India has not been able to solve the problems that India had to solve in a slave country without a budget or technology. He also negotiates with the British and worries about widowhood. Kanya Kelvani starts from de-addiction and fights ideas from khadi to self-reliant apna bazaar like Swadeshi Mall. Together with the spellbook, he has to take up the task of translating the Gita himself and write 'Gandhi Yuga' to inspire so many writers. Jivram Joshi to Ramanlal Soni Charkho Kantata Children's Literature Serge and Moolshankar Mohanlal Bhatt to Julie Verne wearing the same khadi to translate Victor Hugo's French stories into Gujarati. Zaverchand Meghani Dolly, who wrote the epic of heroism with the same ideal of non-violence, got up and became a Gandhi lover and Manubhai Pancholi became an educator with Darshak Sahityasarjak. This is just about Gujarat! Such franchise models run in different areas across the country. There is nothing to gain, even if you have to give up! Agenda from environment (Sabarmati Ashram to 'Gujarat' Vidyapeeth Bapu riding a bicycle every day, how many fitness fireworks do you know?) Charkho was an indigenous model of economics as the British enriched London, destroying India's thousands of years old textile industry. Doso, who had undergone military training, including rifle shooting, in World War I, was not mad at the seemingly unrealistic ideals of 'truth' and 'non-violence'! He has made exceptions to his non-violence, as well as the scripture of when to fast. But for that, after filling the cupboards and reading the scriptures, one has to open the mouth. Educated in foreign, learned ballroom dancing, this man wrote all his shortcomings in his autobiography, and gives open answers. Every question, that is, without a distorted context, 'Hi hi', if you say so, 'Kuthali' like you are starting to make a fuss today. Why react in realization

Why don't you come and ask your corporator why he didn't give in to Shraddhanand? Can't seek public response on petrol and diesel prices. Just living like a coward in an imaginary fear that Hindus will perish in Gandhiji's sin! This is like giving importance to Gandhiji and making him an incarnation that everyone can write the same destiny!

Gandhiji's diagnosis of the disease has left India in a dilemma that if India's self-government is to be strong, two ditches have to be filled. Communalism and untouchability. (Communal polarization is one of the most outrageous issues in the politics of the country today!) Does he do it?) Gaining prestige in public life, Bapu, who has enough honest transparency to describe his own experiments of ex-celibacy by opening all the hymns (where to get the rest of the criticizing spices, time travel and arranging CCTV?) Has kept a calculated silence. You have to check the reference and go deeper. Supporting the caliphate was the Mahatma's fault. But it was probably a deliberate mistake. He said that his own faith could be won. But if we do not win the trust of the Muslims, then the radical Islamists will cling to the radical Islamists on the same frequency. Not to live together, to be together.

Let's Get Divorced to Nation Theory. Jinnah-Savarkar were saying the same thing in two different words. But suppose the British did not like the idea of ​​separating a quarter of the population of that country at that time. Gandhi's diagnosis was perfect that one must learn to live together by compromising, accepting the coexistence of the compromise of interfaith harmony instead of the secularism of foreign secularism, and gradually abandoning old traditions, keeping faith intact, giving up superstition. "I do not agree with clerics or clerics who do not define Islam after Muhammad or Christianity after Jesus," he wrote. Religion changes over time. I am a Hindu of Sanat so it is not at all possible to accept all the falsehoods of my scriptures. If it is wrong, the old one has to leave us! '

But his intention was that, just by saying that, Ginny would resist the confrontation, if we first improve our behavior, then the model will change. Criticism alone does not change relatives from within. In a few decades the atmosphere that has not existed for centuries could not be created in a few decades, but the treatment failed. Not the direction of diagnosis. Because, a bigger solution than this has not come from anyone else today and even Bhagwatji of the Sangh often talks about Hindu-Muslim unity. But Muslims do not trust, so how to win that trust?

Just, Gandhiji leaned a little more in that struggle. But Maulana Shaukat Ali, who was with him in the caliphate, was told the same thing when he started making inflammatory speeches in the thirties, saying, "You are not the one I know. "Your perception that Hindus are attacking others and Muslims are deprived is wrong."

But this Hindu-Muslim issue is such that the matter gets in the way. And despite all that hype, this writer and reader is still alive and still in 5 years. None of them died at all. It was about the nation that became possible only because of Gandhiji, the only and only modern democracy in India. Sorry, the series, which was supposed to be completed in three installments, has been extended in the area of ​​some details due to public demand. Eno in the spectrometer next Sunday.

Xing Ping

"Gandhiji was more Hindu than the Hindu Mahasabha. Were more communist than communist. (Were more liberal than liberal). If you ask the common people of India about Gandhiji, you will know from his answer how hollow or capable that man is. Gandhiji was a litmus paper, a test of acids and alkalis in chemistry. It was magic! "

- Chandrakant Bakshi